Smarter Policy Distribution
End-to-End Insurtech Platform
Your Strategic Insurance Ally
AI WhatsApp Bot
Identify safety risks before incidents occur
Enhancing Fleet Security and Visibility
ADAS | DMS | Connected Video
Redefine Efficiency & Maximize ROI
Make Your Reps Smarter
Digital Tools for Seamless Mobility
Smart Management & Insights
Your Cold Logistics Tech Partner
Modernize Cash Logistics with Tech
Streamline Fleet Operations with IoT
Digitize. Optimize. Succeed.
Accurate Returns & Reconciliations
Achieve More with Every Transaction
Transformative Logistics Solutions
API-Enabled Seamless Integrations
Reliable and Hassle-Free Returns
Streamlined Tax Notice Management
Centralized Purchases, Faster Approvals
Unlock Document Data with Gen AI
Chat Smarter. Assist Faster.
Computer Vision for Real-Time Oversight.
Accounts Payable automation has matured significantly over the past decade, yet one critical performance metric has barely moved: the first-pass invoice match rate.
Across industries, finance teams continue to see one in four invoices failing automated matching, triggering exceptions, manual intervention, and processing delays. While automation technologies have improved dramatically, many organisations still operate with match rates stuck in the 70–75% range, far below best-in-class performance.
This report examines why that plateau exists, what benchmarking data reveals about AP performance across industries, and how modern finance teams can break through the match-rate ceiling.
Download the report to understand where most AP processes fail — and how leading organisations are redesigning them.
With the GST e-invoicing mandate now covering enterprises with turnover above ₹5 crore, India is generating over 2 billion e-invoices annually. Yet the back-end matching infrastructure hasn’t kept pace.
Indian enterprises face a compounded challenge: vendor fragmentation across Tier-2 and Tier-3 suppliers, inconsistent invoice formats, and ERP configurations never designed for high-volume three-way matching. The result is an exception rate that routinely exceeds the global average.
Delayed payments also carry a direct cost. Under the MSME Development Act, enterprises paying MSME vendors beyond 45 days risk disallowance of expenses under Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act — a risk that often begins with an invoice stuck in exception.
This makes invoice matching a critical part of the procure-to-pay cycle. When it works well, invoices move through AP workflows without intervention. When it fails, the entire process slows down.
Manual invoice exceptions do more than slow processing—they drive measurable cost increases across the AP function.
Industry research shows:
For organisations processing hundreds or thousands of invoices each month, that gap represents a substantial operational cost and delayed financial visibility.
This benchmarking report synthesizes insights from multiple AP research studies (2024–2025) to understand why invoice match rates stagnate — and how organisations can improve them.
Inside the report, you’ll discover:
This resource is designed for finance and procurement leaders responsible for AP performance and working capital visibility.
It will be particularly valuable for:
If your AP team is struggling with invoice exceptions, delayed approvals, or inconsistent vendor submissions, this report provides a practical framework for improvement.
